WEKO3
アイテム
英語の与格交替におけるモダリティの役割について
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/4914
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/491488b820bb-880b-4b05-bed7-aacaa9838319
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
清泉人文科学研究科論集14_107-123.pdf (680.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2012-07-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 英語の与格交替におけるモダリティの役割について | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | A Brief Consideration on Modality in Dative Alternation in English | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 著者 |
田林, 洋一
× 田林, 洋一 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 9392 | |||||
| 姓名 | Tabayashi, Yoichi | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| bibliographic_information |
ja : 清泉女子大学大学院人文科学研究科論集 巻 14, p. 107-123, 発行日 2008 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 清泉女子大学大学院人文科学研究科 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| item_1_source_id_11 | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10580844 | |||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 800 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 830 | |||||
| NIIサブジェクト | ||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 言語学 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper elucidates the modality of dative alternation and its corresponding double object construction. At first I explain double object construction, to-dative construction and for-dative construction. Next, I investigate to-double object construction (to-DOC) and show that the element of the first argument has to "possess" that of the second argument and speaker or the subject has to "intend" to move the second object. Therefore, the first argument should be animate. Secondly I investigate for-double object construction (for-DOC) and state that the process of movement should be for the benefit of the first argument and only the first argument will have some "confidence" in the act of that movement. Thirdly I explain differences between to-DOC and for-DOC. It is crucially important that on to-DOC we have to consider the volitionality of both speaker and arguments, whereas on for-DOC we can consider only that of arguments. Also I try to show the syntactic and semantic structure of these constructions. Finally, according to the statement by Nakau (1994), I insist that the concept of modality should be divided into two, discourse modality and propositional modality, and the former corresponds to to-DOC and the latter corresponds to for-DOC. | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
