WEKO3
アイテム
On the directionality and maintenance of language policy in revitalization efforts
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/1010
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/10104401c4d3-dc6f-459e-a9ae-fe936fb1fe3f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
北言38_1-16.pdf (572.1 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-07-17 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | On the directionality and maintenance of language policy in revitalization efforts | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 著者 |
Clankie, Shawn M.
× Clankie, Shawn M. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 言語文化部紀要 巻 38, p. 1-16, 発行日 2000 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 北海道大学言語文化部 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN / EISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0286-3855 | |||||
| 書誌ID（NCID） | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00081804 | |||||
| テキストバージョン | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 801 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 802 | |||||
| NIIサブジェクト | ||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 言語学 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper centers upon two distinct, yet inter-related concerns in language revitalization efforts. The first problem is that of directionality, or the direction from which language policy is generated and implimented. The traditional notions of top-down (government-imposed) and bottom-up (grass-roots public-imposed) policy implimenation will be considered in the context of individual language situations. Fishman has argued that the most succesful approach to language planning is from the bottom-up. In direct contrast, governmental language policy frequently mandated (by its very nature) a top-down approach. An argument is made in this paper that neither approach, in and of itself, can be entirely succesful without the other an that the present societal structure where the language is to be used must be considered. Once a language revitalization policy is established the second concern must be the maintenance and preservation of that policy against attempts to destroy that policy. All language policy is political. This section offers five suggestions for preserving the existing policy, while at the same time allowing the policy to grow and develop. As little research currently exists on this part of language planning, this section seeks to offer those at the starting end of language revitalization a view of what can and is being done in other linguistic contexts. | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
