WEKO3
アイテム
ハイエクと大恐慌 : 理論と観察の狭間で
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/898
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/89886c30fcd-0d4e-42f1-9e09-ada12c4a9c2c
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
経史年37_82-94.pdf (739.1 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-06-05 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | ハイエクと大恐慌 : 理論と観察の狭間で | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Hayek and the great depression | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 著者 |
江頭, 進
× 江頭, 進 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 1701 | |||||
| 姓名 | Egashira, Susumu | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
経済学史学会年報 巻 37, p. 82-94, 発行日 1999-11 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 経済史学会 | |||||
| ISSN / EISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0453-4786 | |||||
| 書誌ID（NCID） | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00070138 | |||||
| 著作権注記 | ||||||
| 権利情報 | 経済学史学会より許諾 | |||||
| テキストバージョン | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 331 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 332 | |||||
| NIIサブジェクト | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 経済学 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between F.A. Hayek's theory and his observation on the real economy. His early works, written in German, did not wholly reflecton his monetary business cycle theory; Some critical gap lies between them, and his disregard for several important factors led him to formulate a faulty theoly. We are concerned not with pointing out the limitations of Hayek's theory, but with considering the reason why his theory appears to have taken precedence over his previous observations. The first section is an introduction. In the second section, we survey his works, which were mainly composed in his Austrian days. The third section shows the outline of his business cycle theory, then, in the fourth section, We consider a possible explanation for the gap between his theory and observations, and conclude that it resulted from the influence of Mises. | |||||
