WEKO3
アイテム
ハイエクと進化
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/897
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/89747449aa9-017a-42b9-88e7-cf9e22156527
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
経史年33_101-112.pdf (677.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-06-05 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | ハイエクと進化 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Hayek's evolutionary concept | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 著者 |
江頭, 進
× 江頭, 進 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 1699 | |||||
| 姓名 | Egashira, Susumu | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
経済学史学会年報 巻 33, p. 101-112, 発行日 1995-10 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 経済学史学会 | |||||
| ISSN / EISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0453-4786 | |||||
| 書誌ID（NCID） | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00070138 | |||||
| 著作権注記 | ||||||
| 権利情報 | 経済学史学会より許諾 | |||||
| テキストバージョン | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 331 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 332 | |||||
| NIIサブジェクト | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 経済学 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper deals with F.A. Hayek's theory of evolution. It is wellknown that F.A. Hayek's spontaneous order theory is based on the theory of evolution, but there are few works which focus on Hayek's evolutionary concept itself. However, this concept is important for understanding Hayek's social and economic philosophy. In this paper, the concept is clarified through Comparison with the theories of H.Spencer, A.Marshall and T.Veblen. The keyfeatures of Hayek's theory are that; (1) he did not use a biological analogy; (2) he thought that social evolution should be described as the development of order. Unlike Marshall, Hayek thought that a biological analogy distorted the character of social phenomenon so that the theory of social evoloution had to be unique. In the first section of this paper, an outline of theories of Spencer, Marshall and Veblen is presented, which emphasizes how they differ in how they apply various aspects of the theory of evolution to social sciences. The second section explains Hayek's theory of evolution. In the third section the relation between the theory of evolution and the spontaneous order theory is highlighted. In the last section, the central problem raised up by Hayek is considered. | |||||
