WEKO3
アイテム
Small Government in the 21st Century
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/4225
http://hdl.handle.net/10252/42254d125d48-3806-4401-9429-7b89882dd893
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
DP_26.PDF (1.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | テクニカルレポート / Technical Report(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-06-16 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Small Government in the 21st Century | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh | |||||
| 資源タイプ | technical report | |||||
| 著者 |
Shibuya, Hiroshi
× Shibuya, Hiroshi |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 8508 | |||||
| 姓名 | 渋谷, 博史 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
Discussion paper series 巻 26, p. 1-19, 発行日 1996-09 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 小樽商科大学ビジネス創造センター | |||||
| テキストバージョン | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 343 | |||||
| NIIサブジェクト | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 経済学 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In this paper we tried to consider the fiscal reconstruction processes in the United States and Japan mainly from the viewpoint of the "logic of taxpayers", which brings the pressures to control the costs of welfare state for the aged. But today's pressures toward "small government" have one more purpose, to get rid of or to reduce the obstacles against market mechnism and economic growth, which are brought by interventions and regulations of government. In 21st century, because of the speed-up of the aging trend and the explosion of welfare state costs, I think, more reduction of governmental activities in many fields will be needed to promote economic growth and the resulting expansion of tax base. Many liberal policy measures, brought out by 20th century "big government", can not be maintained. Finally because of cost-explosion of the "aged-measure" part of the welfare state, the "nonaged-measure" part comes under much stricter pressures to be cut. I would hope that the representers and disputants in the second session add this viewpoint to their discussion. | |||||
