{"created":"2023-05-15T15:28:24.321358+00:00","id":456,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"98dccc72-2874-45e8-a963-b9cc326d9525"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"456","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"456"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:barrel.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000456","sets":[]},"author_link":["1090","1091"],"item_5_biblio_info_5":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2008-03-25","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"4","bibliographicPageEnd":"293","bibliographicPageStart":"269","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"58","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"商学討究"}]}]},"item_5_description_10":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"東京高裁平成19年3月28日民事11部判決（平18（ネ）2685号）","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_5_description_4":{"attribute_name":"カテゴリ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"判例評釈","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_5_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1091","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Hayashi, Seiji"}]}]},"item_5_publisher_6":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"小樽商科大学"}]},"item_5_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌ID（NCID）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00114062","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_5_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN / EISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"04748638","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_5_subject_16":{"attribute_name":"日本十進分類法","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"327.7","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"}]},"item_5_subject_17":{"attribute_name":"NIIサブジェクト","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"法律・法律学","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_5_version_type_15":{"attribute_name":"テキストバージョン","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"林, 誠司"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2016-01-22"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"ER_58(4)_269-293.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"8.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"ER_58(4)_269-293.pdf","url":"https://barrel.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/456/files/ER_58(4)_269-293.pdf"},"version_id":"008ddcc4-6fa7-46fb-a922-643e85a0fa66"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"1. 会社員が少年グループに、監禁、拉致、リンチされて殺害された事案について、警察の捜査等に不手際があったとして、遺族の県に対する国家賠償請求が認められた事例　2. 捜査上の過失と犯罪の結果との間の相当因果関係を否定したが、当該過失がなければ3割程度の犯罪の結果回避可能性があったとして、この可能性の侵害による損害賠償が肯定された事例","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"1. 会社員が少年グループに、監禁、拉致、リンチされて殺害された事案について、警察の捜査等に不手際があったとして、遺族の県に対する国家賠償請求が認められた事例　2. 捜査上の過失と犯罪の結果との間の相当因果関係を否定したが、当該過失がなければ3割程度の犯罪の結果回避可能性があったとして、この可能性の侵害による損害賠償が肯定された事例"},{"subitem_title":"Note on Civil Law Case","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"5","owner":"3","path":["91"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2008-04-16"},"publish_date":"2008-04-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"456","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["1. 会社員が少年グループに、監禁、拉致、リンチされて殺害された事案について、警察の捜査等に不手際があったとして、遺族の県に対する国家賠償請求が認められた事例　2. 捜査上の過失と犯罪の結果との間の相当因果関係を否定したが、当該過失がなければ3割程度の犯罪の結果回避可能性があったとして、この可能性の侵害による損害賠償が肯定された事例"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-08-08T07:56:08.148156+00:00"}